P(reach target)
Enter values
Enter outcomes and probabilities to get the expected value, variance, and standard deviation of a discrete distribution, with a probability check that shows the running sum and one-click normalize.
Add outcomes and their probabilities to see the expected value.
Expected value E[X]
Add outcomes
Population mean of the entered distribution.
| x | p | x·p | (x - μ)²·p |
|---|
P(reach target)
Enter values
P(ruin)
Enter values
E[X] = μ = Σ xᵢ·pᵢ; σ² = Σ (xᵢ - μ)²·pᵢ; σ = √σ²
How?
The expected value is the probability-weighted mean of the outcomes. Because the probabilities define the entire distribution, this is a population: there is no sample, so no n - 1 (Bessel) correction is applied. The variance is computed in deviation form, Σ (xᵢ - μ)²·pᵢ, rather than the algebraic identity E[X²] - μ². The two are equal, but the deviation form avoids the catastrophic cancellation that E[X²] - μ² suffers when the mean is large relative to the spread.
Expected value is a long-run average over many independent trials, not a prediction of the next draw. The standard deviation reports how far a single result can land from that average, in the same units as the outcomes.
Probabilities are validated: each must lie in [0, 1], and their sum is checked against 1 within a tolerance of 1e-9 (so 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.7 counts as exact). A sum other than 1 is never silently accepted. The running sum is shown, and one click normalizes each probability by dividing it by Σp.
Formula: E[X] = μ = Σ xᵢ·pᵢ; σ² = Σ (xᵢ - μ)²·pᵢ; σ = √σ²
Gambler's Ruin models a bankroll that changes by $1 per step: you win a step with probability p and lose it with probability q = 1 - p, starting at i and cashing out at a target N, with absorbing barriers at 0 and N. For a fair game (p = 1/2) the probability of reaching N before ruin is i/N and the expected number of steps is i(N - i). For a biased game it uses the ratio ρ = q/p. This is bankroll arithmetic, and it says nothing about the memory of the trials.
The Gambler's Fallacy is the belief that independent trials have memory: that a run of losses makes a win "due", or that a streak of reds makes black more likely next spin. Independent trials have no memory. Each spin of a fair American roulette wheel lands on any one number with probability 1/38 regardless of what came before, so a past streak does not shift the next outcome. Gambler's Ruin is about the bankroll; the Gambler's Fallacy is about the trials, and confusing the two is the mistake these two blocks separate.